New revelations on ACTA, the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), a secretive global copyright being privately negotiated by rich countries away from the UN: ACTA will require ISPs to police trademarks the way they currently police copyright. That means that if someone accuses you of violating a trademark with a web-page, blog-post, video, tweet, etc, your ISP will be required to nuke your material without any further proof, or be found to be responsible for any trademark violations along with you. And of course, trademark violations are much harder to verify than copyright violations, since they often hinge on complex, fact-intensive components like tarnishment, dilution and genericization. Meaning that ISPs are that much more likely to simply take all complaints at face-value, leading to even more easy censorship of the Internet with nothing more than a trumped-up trademark claim.
At first glance, the leak suggests intermediaries such as ISPs and search engine portals may now be liable for trademark infringements by their account holders – unless there are clear exceptions such as the Safe Harbour provisions available under the Copyright Act regulations.
Professor Anna George, adjunct professor at Murdoch University and former DFAT negotiator on WTO TRIPS and the digital economy chapters of the US-Australia Free Trade Agreement, believed such a change would potentially be bad news for Australia’s trade relations.
ACTA: ISPs could be liable for trademark infringements
(Thanks, NeilM!)
- How ACTA will change the world's internet laws
- USA caves on secret Internet treaty
- Secret copyright treaty: USA caves on border laptop/phone/MP3 …
- Latest leaked draft of secret copyright treaty: US trying to cram …
- Secret copyright treaty will sideline the UN and replace it with …
- Biggest-ever ACTA leak: secret copyright treaty dirty laundry …