Travel blogger Christopher Elliot has an informed post up about the odd timing of the latest terror scare, and a theory that this might be "just another cleverly-timed event that pushes us toward mandatory full-body scans at the airport," just like the underwear failbomber conveniently ended a lively debate about the privacy issues posed by "strip-search machines."
If you aren't a conspiracy theorist, then last weekend's foiled bomb plot will just strike you as an interesting coincidence. Which it certainly is.
No matter who you are, though, the happenings of the last two weeks, which include the Transportation Security Administration's imposition of new enhanced pat-down procedures for passengers who refuse the full-body scans, the terrorism scare, and a pilot who refused to undergo the TSA's new screening, all lead to the same question: When will the government force us to go through these new machines?
Probably a lot sooner than we think.
When will full-body scans become mandatory? (elliott.org)
- What the TSA's new body scanner images look like
- TSA forces pregnant traveller into full-body scanner
- What happened when one pilot refused to submit to "naked …
- Surprise! Feds stored thousands of checkpoint body scan images …
- Naked scanner reveals airport screener's tiny penis, sparks steel …
- TSA lied: naked-scanners can store and transmit images
- TSA may install devices at airports to detect and track personal …
- TSA demands testicular fondling as an alternative to naked …
- British Airways chairman: "stop kowtowing to US aviation security …
