Not only are torture techniques like waterboarding, sleep deprivation, and forced stress positions evil, they don’t work very well for interrogation. Jacques Vallee talked about that on BB last year in his provocative essay, “Waterboarding’s curious corollaries.” This week’s New Scientist also considers the efficacy of torture and “cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment” (CIDT). On the heels of Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay, Obama established the High-Value Detainee Interrogation Group to study and practice “scientifically proven” techniques to interrogate without torture or CIDT, which are illegal.
The idea that coercive interrogation works rests on an untested and largely unsupported framework, says Shane O’Mara, director of the Institute of Neuroscience at Trinity College Dublin, Ireland. On the face of it, the coercive model for interrogation seems like common sense: there is information that the interrogator wants to know and the subject holds but doesn’t want to give up. The interrogator applies some pressure to break down the defences put up by the subject, who then spills the desired information. “You see this model repeatedly in movies and TV series such as 24,” says O’Mara.Whether it really works like that is questionable, however. “Everything we know shows that the ability to accurately retrieve information is severely impaired under conditions of extreme stress,” O’Mara says. Studies on soldiers, for instance, have shown that manipulating sleep, food and temperature produces severe effects on memory, even when people are willing to give up information.
In a recent paper, O’Mara outlined the problem (Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol 13, p 497). Both torture and CIDT flood the brain with stress hormones such as cortisol and the catecholamines, with potentially profound effects. Three regions are especially affected: the hippocampus, which is important in retrieving long-term memories; the amygdala, which forms part of the fear network; and the frontal lobes. Disturbances of these regions are likely to kick in during coercive interrogation, particularly if such questioning continues for weeks or months.
In addition, prolonged stress could also lead to the creation of false memories based on information and supposed facts presented by the interrogator. This phenomenon, known as confabulation in psychiatric jargon, is also found in people with frontal lobe disorders. “These people are not consciously making stuff up or trying to lie,” says O’Mara. “But they have difficulty discriminating between genuine memories and those that don’t bear any relationship to events they have experienced. Though the occurrence of confabulation in torture victims is more speculative, it’s a marked possibility.”
“Beyond torture: the future of interrogation”